Corruption and competition in procurement auctions
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigate the effect of corruption on competition in procurement. Our assumption is that the bureaucrat (i.e., the agent that administers the market), if corrupt, may provide an opportunity for bid readjusments in exchange for a bribe. As firms expect to be paying a bribe, a mechanical effect of corruption is to increase the contract price by an amount corresponding to the anticipated bribe. We show, however, that a key effect of corruption is to facilitate collusion in price between firms and thereby to generate a price increase that goes far beyond the bribe received by the bureaucrat. We discuss the effect of other forms of bureaucratic discretion in the procurement process and analyze conditions under which unilateral anticorruption controls restore price competition.
منابع مشابه
Corruption and Competition in Public Market Auctions
This paper investigates the effect of corruption on competition in government procurement auctions. Our assumption is that the bureaucrat (i.e. the agent that administers the market), if corrupt, may provide a favor in exchange for a bribe. The favor we consider in most of our analysis is the opportunity to readjust a bid. We show that a key effect of corruption is to facilitate collusion in pr...
متن کاملCan Regulations Reduce Corruption? Evidence from a Bribe-giving Firm‟s Records
This paper analyzes the internal bribery records made available for research by an Asian trading firm. It documents pervasive corruption in government procurement and evaluates the impact of different auction regulations. The average kickback was 14.7% of the product cost when auctions were not mandatory. To fight corruption, the government mandated best-value auctions in 2001, and strengthened...
متن کاملCollusive market-sharing and corruption in procurement
This paper investigates links between corruption and collusion in procurement. A rst-price multiple-object auction is administered by an agent who has legal discretion to allow for a readjustment of (all) submitted o¤ers before the o¢ cial opening. The agent may be corrupt, i.e. willing to sellhis decision in exchange for a bribe. Our main result shows that the corrupt agents incentives to ...
متن کاملCorruption and competition in procurement1
We consider a procurement problem in which the procurement agent is supposed to allocate the realization of a project according to a competitive mechanism that values bids in terms of the proposed price and quality. Potential bidders have private information about their production costs. Since the procurement agent is also in charge of verifying delivered quality, in exchange for a bribe, he ca...
متن کاملProcurement Auctions with Pre-award Subcontracting
To be the lowest bidders in procurement auctions, contractors commonly solicit subcontract bids at the bid preparation stage. A remarkable feature of the subcontract competition is that “winning is not everything”; the lowest subcontractor gets a job conditional on his contractor’s successful bid. This paper makes the first attempt to establish a model for such pre-award subcontract competition...
متن کامل